Please Don’t Do it Rory! Don’t do it Rory!!

Recently, Rory McIlroy has found himself at the center of controversy, once again sparking debate among golf’s vocal critics, including prominent analysts like Brandel Chamblee and Eamon Lynch. These pundits have previously expressed vehement opposition to golf’s involvement with entities they perceive as morally compromising, particularly in the case of LIV Golf’s Saudi Arabian connections. However, the recent announcement that NBC Sports and Golf Channel will be providing coverage for the DP World Tour event in the United Arab Emirates raises questions about consistency and integrity in these critiques.

The outcry against Rory and his participation in such events seems curiously subdued this time. Why? Could it be that the involvement of major media outlets like NBC Sports and Golf Channel, both significant stakeholders in golf’s coverage, has tempered their response? This leads to a crucial question: Are the same PGA Tour sycophants who raged against LIV Golf’s Saudi ties willing to extend their criticism to Rory, HSBC Bank, and the DP World Tour, given their partnerships and the human rights record of the UAE?

The UAE, like Saudi Arabia, has a deeply controversial human rights record. The country’s legal system is based on Sharia law, under which homosexuality and extramarital sex are criminalized. Polygamy is permitted for men, and women often face restrictions that dictate their behavior in accordance with the wishes of their male guardians. Reports of forced disappearances, torture, beatings, and severe restrictions on free speech and internet use are widespread. Yet, this has not deterred the DP World Tour, a partner of the PGA Tour, from holding events there or from their players participating.

This raises the question of double standards. Why is there such a stark contrast in the reactions to Rory’s involvement with the DP World Tour compared to the outrage over LIV Golf’s Saudi connections? Have Chamblee and Lynch, who have positioned themselves as moral arbiters of the sport, maintained their integrity by addressing these issues consistently, or has their outrage been selective?

Considering these factors, one must wonder if Chamblee and Lynch, if they were genuinely committed to their principles, would resign in protest against their own organization’s support and broadcasting of events in regions with significant human rights abuses. Their silence in the face of these contradictions could suggest that their previous moral indignation was either selective or feigned.

In this context, the question arises: Have these critics ever had to apologize for their affiliation with the PGA Tour or the DP World Tour? If not, why should Rory be subjected to a different standard?

As golf continues to navigate the complexities of global politics and human rights issues, it is crucial for its stakeholders to address these concerns consistently. Selective outrage does little to advance the cause of human rights and risks undermining the credibility of those who seek to hold others accountable.

**@PGATOURComms @PGATOUR @DPWorldTour @livgolf_league @LIVGolfComms @PIF_en**