Trump calls The View hosts ‘stupid,’ touches on everything from aliens to past appointments in Rogan interview – Live Updates
The Washington Post on Friday announced it will no longer endorse presidential candidates, breaking decades of tradition in a move that immediately garnered fierce backlash from both employees and outside critics. At least one editor has already resigned, and the paper’s legendary former top editor Marty Baron publicly rebuked the move as an act of…
The Washington Post on Friday announced it will no longer endorse presidential candidates, breaking decades of tradition in a move that immediately garnered fierce backlash from both employees and outside critics.
At least one editor has already resigned, and the paper’s legendary former top editor Marty Baron publicly rebuked the move as an act of “cowardice.”
The Post is the second major newspaper this week to punt on a presidential endorsement, following a similar decision by the Los Angeles Times on Wednesday at the instruction of its billionaire owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, that led to the resignation of the editorials editor and multiple staffers.
In a note published to the paper’s website announcing the move, Washington Post publisher Will Lewis called it a “statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds,” writing that it would help the publication focus on “nonpartisan news for all Americans” from the newsroom and “thought-provoking, reported views from our opinion team to help our readers make up their own minds.”
“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility,” Lewis added. “That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way.”
The Post’s newsroom and editorial team erupted in outrage. Robert Kagan, a neoconservative columnist and editor at large at the Post, resigned in response, he confirmed in a statement to POLITICO. A spokesperson for the Post declined to comment on Kagan’s resignation.
David Maraniss, a 46-year veteran reporter at the paper, publicly called the move “contemptible,” writing in a social media post: “Today is the bleakest day of my journalism career.”
And on Friday evening, nine of the paper’s opinion columnists published a scathing dissent of the decision, calling it “a terrible mistake” that “represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love, and for which we have worked a combined 228 years.”
“There is no contradiction between The Post’s important role as an independent newspaper and its practice of making political endorsements, both as a matter of guidance to readers and as a statement of core beliefs,” the columnists wrote. “That has never been more true than in the current campaign.”
“Welp, that’s certainly a new type of October Surprise,” Ashley Parker, a senior national political correspondent for the Post, wrote on X.
In a statement, the newspaper’s union attributed the decision to billionaire owner Jeff Bezos and said the move “undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers’ trust, not losing it.”
“The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis — not from the Editorial Board itself — makes us concerned that management interfered with the work of our members in Editorial,” the union wrote. “According to our own reporters and Guild members, an endorsement for Harris was already drafted, and the decision to not to publish was made by The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos.”
A person close to the decision granted anonymity to discuss it told POLITICO that the decision was made within the Post and did not come from Bezos.
But others were quick to point the finger at Bezos.
Baron, who was executive editor from 2012 until his retirement in 2021, called the move “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,” writing on X that Donald Trump “will see this as an invitation to further intimidate” Bezos and others.
“Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage,” Baron wrote.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said in an X post that the move “is what Oligarchy is about.”
“Jeff Bezos, the 2nd wealthiest person in the world and the owner of the Washington Post, overrides his editorial board and refuses to endorse Kamala,” Sanders wrote. “Clearly, he is afraid of antagonizing Trump and losing Amazon’s federal contracts. Pathetic.”
Lewis’ announcement comes months after the publisher made headlines over bombshell reports alleging that he played a role in a phone hacking scandal while he was an editor at the Sunday Times, an accusation he denies. Lewis had clashed over the scandal with the Post’s then-top editor, Sally Buzbee, who reportedly wanted to cover it.
Buzbee and other staffers at the Post also conflicted with Lewis over an organizational overhaul he introduced to split the publication’s newsroom and opinion team into three smaller divisions. Buzbee left the Post in June. Robert Winnett, who was also allegedly involved in the hacking scandal, was originally set to replace Buzbee but withdrew from the position amid the controversy.
The Post has endorsed a presidential candidate in every election since 1992, after choosing neither candidate in the 1988 election.
But Lewis emphasized that the decision is “returning to our roots,” citing an editorial board piece from 1960, when the paper chose not to endorse a presidential candidate after supporting Dwight Eisenhower in the 1952 race.
“In the light of hindsight we retain the view that the arguments for his nomination and election were compelling,” the board wrote at the time. “But hindsight also has convinced us that it might have been wiser for an independent newspaper in the Nation’s Capital to have avoided formal endorsement.”
In 1976, the paper again switched gears to endorse Jimmy Carter. But Lewis said “we had it right before that, and this is what we are going back to.”
“Most of all, our job as the newspaper of the capital city of the most important country in the world is to be independent,” Lewis wrote. “And that is what we are and will be.”